Outline only for research paper

Are you stressed by poor grades and tight deadlines? We have your back. We can do this or a different assignment for you at an affordable price. Use customdissertations.org writing services to score better and meet your deadlines.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

I am doing a research paper on two leaders, one good and one bad. My two leaders are Ronald Reagan-good, Idi Amin. Here are the requirements for the outline:

Submit
a one or two page outline of your research paper. Ensure you include
detail for each section that shows what direction will be taken. Include
a minimum of five references in proper APA format you will use for your
final submission.

Sample beginning outline:

  • Introduction
    • Organizational crisis response will yield both effective and
      ineffective actions as some tasks will be managed well and others will
      fail (Pearson & Clair, 1998).
    • It is important to compare and contrast leadership response to major
      crises to further the understanding of crisis leadership. Mayor
      Giuliani and Mayor Nagin both experienced significant organizational
      crises following major tragedies and their response to organizational
      crisis requires further exploration through a speech analysis of
      emergent themes.
  • Background Information
    • Mayor Giuliani
      • Giuliani worked as an Associate Attorney General and eventually US
        Attorney for Southern District of New York. During his tenure as
        Attorney General, Giuliani focused on drug dealers and organized crime,
        where he had a record 4,152 convictions with only 25 reversals
        (Giuliani, 2006).
      • As mayor from 1993-2001, Giuliani saw a 57 % decline in felony
        crimes and a 68% decline in the murder rate. These, according to Mott
        (2001) made New York City a safer place to live and increased tourism.
    • September 11, 2001
      • The attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, is the
        single greatest tragedy in United States history and is often cited as
        the reason for changing U.S. policy toward terrorism (Lincoln, 2005).
      • New York City’s response to the plane crashes was immediate (within
        five seconds of the first crash), with “principle response from the Fire
        Department of New York, the New York Police Department, the Port
        Authority Police Department (PAPD) and the Mayor’s Office of Emergency
        Management (OEM)” (Kean & Hamilton, 2004, p. 281).
    • Mayor Nagin
      • VP of Cox Communication before becoming mayor (Meister, 2003)
      • Moderate success leading up to Hurricane Katrine (Meister, 2003)
    • Hurricane Katrina
      • Most powerful storm in US history (Vanden Brook & Copeland, 2005)
      • Looting was a major problem (Barringer and Longman, 2005)
    • Literature Review
      • Definition of a crisis
        • Crisis is hard to control (Boin & Hart, 2003)
        • Event that causes extreme distress (Mitroff, 2005)
      • Leaders in a time of crisis
        • Characteristics include think critically, preparation, training, etc. (Mullins, 2003)
        • The public has expectations of the leader (Boin & Hart, 2003)
      • Etc…..

References:

Boin A. & Hart, P. (2003). Public leadership in times of crisis: Mission impossible?

Public Administration Review, 63(5), p. 544.

Giuliani, R. (2006). Biography of Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Retrieved

from http://www.nyc.gov/html/records/rwg/html/bio.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Lincoln, B.G. (2005). Leadership in the aftermath of September, 11th. Dissertation

Abstracts International, 64(02), 570. (UMI No. 3184348).

Mullins, L. (2003). The impact of September 11, 2001 on health

care leadership and environment of care outcome scores of

U.S. hospitals as measured by the joint commission on

accreditation of health care organizations. Dissertation Abstracts, (UMI: 3089102).

Vanden Brook, T. & Copeland, L. (2005, August 29). Hurricane Katrina:

160-mph monster. USA Today.

Rubric

MGMT 371 4.4 Research Paper Benchmark Rubric

MGMT 371 4.4 Research Paper Benchmark Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Content

40.0
pts
Superior
– Outline and bibliographic information is cited accurately, and
annotated entries summarize the article, evaluate its credibility and
purpose, and reflect upon its suitability for research/extension of
thinking. Annotations are thorough yet concise.

35.0
pts
Satisfactory
– Outline and bibliographic information is cited accurately, and
outline summarize the article, evaluate its credibility and purpose, but
only partially reflect upon its suitability for research/extension of
thinking.

27.0
pts
Poor –
Outline and bibliographic information and/or annotated entries show
little to no attempt to: accurately cite, summarize the journals,
articles, etc. to evaluate and use for research. • In addition, it does
not reflect upon the articles’ suitability for research/extension of
thinking.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Mechanics

30.0
pts
Superior
– There are little to no grammatical mistakes and informal or slang
language, such as the use of 1st or 2nd person or contractions. • The
writer has used academic language and tone. • There are few to no
spelling and punctuation errors.

26.0
pts
Satisfactory
– There are few grammatical mistakes and informal or slang language,
such as the use of 1st or 2nd person or contractions. • The writer has
used academic language and tone with some minor lapses. • Few spelling
and punctuation errors.

20.0
pts
Poor –
There are frequent grammatical mistakes and informal or slang language,
such as the use of 1st or 2nd person or contractions. • The writer has
frequently used informal language or slang. • There are frequent
spelling and punctuation errors.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Formatting

30.0
pts
Superior
– Assignment is in proper APA format, including format for page
heading, header, margins, and spacing. Reference page is in alphabetical
order by source author or title.

26.0
pts
Satisfactory
– Assignment has a few errors in proper APA format, including format
for page heading, header, margins, and spacing. • Reference page is in
alphabetical order by source author or title.

20.0
pts
Poor –
Assignment shows little to no attempt to use proper APA format,
including format for page heading, header, margins, and spacing. •
reference page is not in alphabetical order by source author or title.

30.0 pts

Total Points:
100.0

We offer CUSTOM-WRITTEN, CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL, and PRIVATE writing services. Kindly click on the ORDER NOW button to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 10% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE10


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.