Informatics discussion
Are you stressed by poor grades and tight deadlines? We have your back. We can do this or a different assignment for you at an affordable price. Use customdissertations.org writing services to score better and meet your deadlines.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
A requirement for NSG 3319, Informatics in Nursing is to write a scholarly discussion that focuses on a current topic related to nursing informatics and/or healthcare technology.
The following rubric contains the criteria that will be used to evaluate your participation in the NSG 3319 Scholarly Discussion.
Guidelines for Writing the Discussion for NSG 3319
A requirement for NSG 3319, Informatics in Nursing is to write a scholarly discussion that focuses on a current topic related to nursing informatics and/or healthcare technology. The discussion must include:
· A selected topic from NSG 3319 (such as Electronic Health Records, Evidence-Based Practice, or Electronic Nursing Documentation). I recommend that you also perform a literature search on your topic. This search will ensure that you are able to locate enough information for your discussion.
· Proceed to work on completing the discussion:
· Introduction to discussion (tell the reader the purpose of the discussion). The introductory paragraph does not carry a heading.
·
Background regarding on your selected topic (Or in other words why is this topic important to nursing and technology?) (First-level heading)
·
Literature review (What did your literature research reveal on the topic?) (First-level heading)
·
Topic’s relevance to nursing (How does the topic relate your practice area? Why is the chosen topic so important for the nursing profession?) (First-level heading)
·
Impact on nursing practice (How has topic impacted your practice area? What trends have improved?) (First-level heading)
·
Conclusion (Restate you main points of evidence for the reader, usually one paragraph.) (First-level heading)
· Title page and Reference page are required. A minimum of 4 scholarly references are required. References should be no older than 5 years.
Use APA format throughout. Adequate citing (crediting) sources (references) should be evident throughout. Encyclopedias and dictionaries may not be counted as professional references. The narrative should be 4-5 pages (excluding the title page and reference page). Paper should be typed and double-spaced. See course calendar for due dates for this assignment. All must be typed using Microsoft Word. Make sure to use appropriate headings throughout (bolded items above).
The following rubric contains the criteria that will be used to evaluate your participation in the NSG 3319 Scholarly.
Grading Rubic
|
Assessment Rubric |
Points |
Actual Points |
Comments |
|
Timeliness of submission (per syllabus) One day late (with permission) Two days late (with permission) Three days late (with permission) No work submitted for assignment/permission not granted |
5 -5 -10 -15 0 |
||
|
Content of submission Addresses all of the questions assigned for this assignment with extra supporting material and commitment to exploring the topic. Addresses all of the questions posed. Address some but not all of the questions posed. Does not answer all of the questions or the responses are too weak to be considered substantial work. |
40 30 15 0 |
||
|
Detail of submission Submission was clear, understandable, creative, and thoughtful. Ample detail provided with extra effort in explaining the context and elements of subject. Sufficient detail provided to clarify the response and explain context of subject. Lacked sufficient details necessary to be complete. Work may not have fully explored the topic nor did it provide needed information. Not enough detail to answer the question. |
30 20 5 0 |
||
|
Appropriate length of submission Work exceeded the minimum word limit but did not exceed the maximum word limit. Work met the minimum word count limit but did not strive to attain word count within 10-20 words of maximum word count limit. Work exceeded the word count limit or failed to meet the minimum word count. Work failed to meet the minimum word count limit. |
10 7 5 0 |
||
|
Grammar, punctuation, and spelling used in submission. Work is crisp, clear, and succinct. There are no grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors made. Work is generally clear, but unnecessary words are occasionally used. Meaning may be hidden and not evident in the work. Paragraphs or sentence structure may be repetitive. May contain one or two grammatical, punctuation, and no spelling errors. It is hard to know what the writer is trying to express. Writing is convoluted. Work does not follow a logical flow and contains more than two grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. |
15 10 0 |
||
|
Sub-Total |
100 |
||
|
Deductions |
|||
|
References (scholarly and correctly cited and written) in submission. All sources cited in the submission and properly formatted in APA format. Includes the required number of references. All sources cited in submission; however, citations not properly formatted in APA format. Includes less than the required number of references and/or not scholarly references. Not all sources cited in submission; Citations not properly formatted in APA format. Includes minimal amount of references that are not scholarly. |
-0 -5 -10 |
||
|
APA deductions Submission in APA format with no errors. Includes title page, running head, page number, headings, etc. Submission in APA format with some errors. One or two errors in title page, running head, page number, headings, etc. Submission contains substantial APA errors. |
-0 -5 -10 |
||
|
Total |
We offer CUSTOM-WRITTEN, CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL, and PRIVATE writing services. Kindly click on the ORDER NOW button to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.
Get a 10% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE10
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
