In contract law, do you agree that parties to a contract should be left unrestrained drafting its provisions? Can the law be allowed to tilt in favor of one party in a contract (e.g. disadvantaged)?
For this topic, you are expected to analyze and draw a conclusion whether law can be a humanitarian instrument in contractual relations between persons (e.g. between individuals; individuals and corporations; and between corporations ). You should also consider whether Australian contract law adopt the principle of “fair-dealing.” Finally, you should be able to give at least two case law examples which could illustrate that law could yield favor to one of the contracting parties. 3 page at least, single spaced and Havard citing and referencing
Please use Aussie cases