Module 5: Part 3 ********* Approximately 8–10 pages.
Field Notes: Describe the procedures your group used to test the innovative technology.
Write your procedures so another technologist could replicate your Field Study.
Results: What did you discover about the technological innovation you tested?
For this part I will attach the INNOVATION, FIELD REPORT, ETC IN A DOCUMENT . IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THIS PROTOCOL, BASED ON THIS PROJECT YOU WILL DONE THIS LAST PAT. PLEASE TEACHER IS VERY STRICT WITH THIS CLASS, DO YOUR BEST TO PASS THIS MASTERY. RUBRIC BELOW:
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Description: EDPD 8090 Assignment Module 5 Rubric EDSD 7090 Assignment Module 5 Rubric
Field Note Procedures: The description of your Field Report procedures used to test the technological innovation includes a sequential, well-organized, logical, and multi-level outline of the steps followed. The procedures you used could be replicated by other technologists without issues. (2 paragraphs)—
“Field Note Procedures: A justification of the procedure you used to test the technological innovation is provided and includes how you selected the setting, participants, and uses of the innovation; the aspects of the technology your group chose to test; how you conducted the field test; and why you used that procedure to measure the effectiveness of the technological innovation. (2-3 paragraphs) “—
Results: An analysis and synthesis of the potential benefits and implications of applying this technological innovation for teaching and learning include both how students learn and how teachers instruct using this technology. (2 paragraphs)—
Results: An analysis and synthesis of the problems, challenges, and dangers of applying this technological innovation for teaching and learning include both how students learn and how teachers instruct using this technology. (2 paragraphs)—
Results: An analysis and evaluation of the technological innovation to address the benefits, problems, challenges, and dangers of implementation is included. Supporting evidence is provided for each point. (1 paragraph)—
Results: A recommendation is provided with an analysis of where this technology could be used. The analysis provided reasons supported with evidence that a leader would be able to use to endorse its use, including results from current research. (1 paragraph)—
Results: A detailed, creative, and visionary prediction is included about the development of this technological innovation from fad to trend, and is well-documented with experience from the Field Study and current literature/research. (1 paragraph)—
Results: An analysis is provided for the adoption of new media based on how this technological innovation moved through the Gartner Hype Cycle comparing time and expectations with references to innovation triggers, peaking inflated expectations, trough of disillusionment, slope of enlightenment, and the plateau of productivity. A prediction of when the innovation will hit the plateau of productivity is included. (1-2 paragraphs)—
Personal Reflection: An analysis of your growth as a leader/ researcher in educational technology is provided with examples from your work on the Field Study, work in your Reporting Team, and research on your topic. (1-2 paragraphs)—
Personal Reflection: You provided details about the current technological trends that attract you the most with an analysis of why they attract you. You included evidence and examples from the literature to support your position about how your choice related to learning and creativity. (1-2 paragraphs)—
“Personal Reflection: A reflection on the evolution of your Personal Learning Network (PLN) throughout this course is provided. You shared how you need to maintain or improve your PLN to achieve professional and personal goals as they relate to your profession/ workplace and to your Walden program of study. (1 paragraph) “—
Personal Reflection: In your personal reflection, you included a detailed analysis of the elements you added to your PLN as a result of your Field Report sharing the relevance of the new additions to your personal and professional work and growth. (1 paragraph)—
Collaboration: Your Reporting Team indicated that you led or shared leadership of the Field Report. Your Reporting Team indicated that you met all of the following criteria: (a) attended meetings, (b) were timely in scheduled meetings, (c) were prepared to make contributions to team meetings, (d) contributed to the field test process, and (e) contributed to the development and production of the final field test report.—
“Collaboration: You met four of the following criteria: Your Reporting Team indicated that you (a) built community, (b) shared ideas, (c) positively received ideas from others, and (d) contributed to the success of the other members of your Reporting Team.”—
Self-Assessment Using Rubric: You provided a self-assessment of your Innovative Technology Field Report on this rubric and pasted it to the end of the Field Report Template. Your comments were reflective and demonstrated critical thinking about your work on the Field Report. You included areas for improvement in your analysis.—
|Total Points: 60|