In this critical review paper you are required to asses, critique, summarize the main points(briefly and to the point), and then analyze carefully the main points that were summarized (In those two articles. Attached).
In the analysis of these two articles you should include a compare and contrast in the style, technique and content of both articles. As well as answer questions like “does the work achieve its purpose? Fully or only partially? Was the purpose worthwhile to begin with? Or was it too limited, trivial, broad, theoretical, etc.? Is any of the evidence weak or insufficient? In what way? Conversely, is the evidence/support particularly receive or strong? Can I supply future explanation to clarify or support any of the main points, ideas, and arguments? Are there sections you don’t understand, why? Was there any area where the author offered too much or too little information?
Paper format (5-7 pages, double-spaced. APA or MLA style)
-Body: brief summary
-Analysis: evaluate other evidence: sufficient (enough evidence examples), representative, relevant (accurate correlations), accurate, claims fairly qualified
-Response: base your reaction on your own experience, prior knowledge, and opinion
Note: You should use the two articles attached as reference, as well as other references to support your argument.