A child is drowning in the lake, case study help

Are you stressed by poor grades and tight deadlines? We have your back. We can do this or a different assignment for you at an affordable price. Use customdissertations.org writing services to score better and meet your deadlines.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

(A) A child is drowning in the lake. A stranger jumps in to save the child. He succeeds in saving the child—but the reason that he jumped in was not to save the child, but rather to be seen as heroic to his girlfriend, who was hanging out with him by the lake. 

(B) A child is drowning in the lake. A stranger jumps in to save the child. But he’s not as good a swimmer as he had thought. The child drowns and he nearly drowns himself. While he jumped in with the intent of saving the child, he fails to do so, and instead makes himself sick for a week to come. And his girlfriend dumps him jk.

The first case seems to have the right consequences, but the wrong moral intent. The second case has the right intent, but a poor outcome.

Answer the following questions:

(1) Which case – A or B – would the utilitarians say involved a moral act? Which would Kant say was moral? Explain.

(2) Which act do you think was moral – A, B, both, or neither? Justify your answer using a logical argument.

We offer CUSTOM-WRITTEN, CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL, and PRIVATE writing services. Kindly click on the ORDER NOW button to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 10% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE10


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper